David Broder wrote this about John McCain yesterday:
We suspected, and soon had confirmed, that he had limited interest in, and capacity for, the organization and management of large enterprises. His first effort at building a structure for the 2008 presidential race collapsed in near-bankruptcy, costing him the service of many longtime aides. From beginning to end, the campaign that followed has been plagued by internal feuds and McCain’s inability to resolve them.
The last I checked the executive branch of the federal govenrnment was a very large enterprise and the President managed it (or tried to). Of course, a lack of aptitude for being a good president hasn’t always stopped people from seeking the office (see George W. Bush), but McCain’s evident limitations make me wonder how he really sees himself in the role of the presidency. Does he see himself as some sort of conservative crusader like Reagan, or a beloved national hero like Eisenhower? How about a neo-imperialist like his hero, Teddy Roosevelt?
McCain strikes me as someone who thrives on excitement, drama and chaos. When people like that don’t encounter the things they thrive on they have a habit of manufacturing them. When they do encounter those things they have very little incentive to actually mitigate them. This actually wouldn’t be all that bad except for the fact that high levels of excitement, drama and chaos tend to lead to disasterous outcomes.